British Columbia is a great place to educate. We’ve got a fantastic structure that allows (and funds) both public education and private education. In the School Act, we’re told that, for public schools:
76 (1) All schools and Provincial schools must be conducted on strictly secular and nonsectarian principles.
(2) The highest morality must be inculcated, but no religious dogma or creed is to be – taught in a school or Provincial school.
I’m Ok with that. I’ll even ignore the goals of public education in BC because I know that I have the choice to homeschool or enroll my kids in a Christian school where the goals and values taught (for over 14,000 hours of my children’s lives) align with our beliefs.
What I can’t ignore is the public system completely ignoring the school act and teaching Aboriginal Ecological Wisdom and Technology.
“More than any other single concept, the notion of respect for all lifeforms and the land itself is believed to characterize North American indigenous belief systems (Turner et al. 2000). Turner et al. (2000) suggest that at least part of native peoples’ caring for their lands and resources relates directly to the wisdom of acknowledging the spirituality and influential powers in all things, including the earth.” (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol8/iss1/art2/)
The bottom line is that TEWK is based on Aboriginal spiritual beliefs. Most notably, that we’re all connected – every rock, tree, animal and human is connected – and they all have a spirit. That, my friends, sounds like religions dogma to me and definitely does not sound strictly secular.
More worrying, is that “Aboriginal Science” (TEWK) is now being taught in our schools…in science class. I think it’s great to learn about Aboriginal belief systems in social studies, but not as the foundation for scientific thinking.
Here’s a little quote from the BC Science Integrated Resource Package:
“The incorporating of Aboriginal science with western science can provide a meaningful context for Aboriginal students and enhance the learning experience for all students. The inclusion of Aboriginal examples of science and technologies can make the subject more authentic, exciting, relevant and interesting for all students.
Numerous difficulties arise when trying to incorporate indigenous knowledge and world views into the western science classroom. The participants of the Ministry of Education Aboriginal Science meetings therefore suggest a model involving a parallel process, where Aboriginal and Western understandings exist separately, yet side-by-side and in partnership with one another. Each side is enriched by the contrasting perspective that the other brings to any discussion.”
So now they’re teaching Aboriginal religion in our science classes. It gets better. Here’s a quote from an article about the genuises who helped develop Aboriginal religious teaching in our public schools:
“The changes should make science more relevant for aboriginal students who may previously have rejected it because it conflicted with their cultural value systems. “Our goal is to change the way science is taught so that indigenous knowledge has a respected place and children don’t have to deny their identity to study a subject in school,” says Williams.”(http://communications.uvic.ca/edge/aboriginal-science.html)
It sounds nice, doesn’t it? But what it ignores is the fact that this teaching is contrary to the School Act. Could you imagine what would happen if we, as Christians, went to the Ministry of Education and said that we felt our students had to deny their identity as children of God in order to study science in school? What if we demanded the right to have our worldviews respected and included in the curriculum? It would never happen. This is the Ministry’s policy on dealing with conflicts between religious beliefs and scientific discoveries:
“Reconciling scientific discoveries (for example, in genetic engineering) and religious faith poses a particular challenge for some students. While respecting the personal beliefs of students, teachers should be careful to distinguish between knowledge based on the application of scientific methods, and religious teachings and associated beliefs such as creationism, theory of divine creation, or intelligentdesign theory.”
Does anyone else see the glaring discrimination of one religion for another? Why is it that we’re respecting the Aboriginal religious beliefs so much that they’re being taught as a respected science alongside Western science while at the same time we’re telling the Christian kids that their beliefs really aren’t based on any knowledge at all. No, their beliefs aren’t scientific in the least.
I think that our Ministry of Education is on the right track to recognize that some kids will not have their cultural or spiritual values respected in our science classrooms. However, I think it’s incredibly dangerous to teach one religion as “scientific knowledge” while completely dismissing another religion. Keep it all out – teach our kids that there is no creator, that the world just happened, that we’re all an accident – go ahead (although that’s a whole other belief system based on faith). But, don’t teach them that we are all interconnected, that everything on Earth has a spirit that we must respect.
If you are going to take our kids and teach them religious beliefs as science then for God’s sake teach them that they were created and that God gave them an awesome responsibility on this Earth to be caretakers of his creation. Could you imagine if a teacher actually taught that in public school?